<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RadioActive Chief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com</link>
	<description>Stronghold of the VRWC in northwestern Moody County, South Dakota</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on T.A.N.S.T.A.A.F.L. by DuggerSD</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2988&#038;cpage=1#comment-76133</link>
		<dc:creator>DuggerSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2988#comment-76133</guid>
		<description>Here is another link  you may find appropriate for this.
http://www.campusworld.net/campusworld/econ111/eco_tanstaafl.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another link  you may find appropriate for this.<br />
<a href="http://www.campusworld.net/campusworld/econ111/eco_tanstaafl.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.campusworld.net/campusworld/econ111/eco_tanstaafl.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe we DON&#8217;T need NASA to go to Space by Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2957&#038;cpage=1#comment-74359</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2957#comment-74359</guid>
		<description>Nope.  Not yet.  Contain your disappointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  Not yet.  Contain your disappointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maybe we DON&#8217;T need NASA to go to Space by caheidelbeger</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2957&#038;cpage=1#comment-73837</link>
		<dc:creator>caheidelbeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2957#comment-73837</guid>
		<description>And here I thought socialism had killed all innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought socialism had killed all innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Federal Legal Precedence Dead?&#8230;or, Dixie&#8217;s Spirit Still Lives! by Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2893&#038;cpage=1#comment-71372</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2893#comment-71372</guid>
		<description>If congress has the power to pass laws regulating drug traffic at all, the 10th Amendment would be moot in that case.  One COULD argue in the face of over 100 years of precedent back to T.R.&#039;s (1906) Pure Food and Drug Act that Congress did NOT have this power...but, given the current state of &lt;em&gt;stare decisis&lt;/em&gt;, that argument has little firm legal ground to stand on.

Anyway, I see nothing in the 10th Amendment that allows states to actively VIOLATE federal law, as it happening in California, where localities are actively promoting the cultivation, distribution, sale, and taxation of marijuana, which is CLEARLY in violation of federal drug trafficking laws, which have been repeatedly tested in court, and upheld.

I concur that the DoJ&#039;s suit against AZ would be constitutionally destructive if it is successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If congress has the power to pass laws regulating drug traffic at all, the 10th Amendment would be moot in that case.  One COULD argue in the face of over 100 years of precedent back to T.R.&#8217;s (1906) Pure Food and Drug Act that Congress did NOT have this power&#8230;but, given the current state of <em>stare decisis</em>, that argument has little firm legal ground to stand on.</p>
<p>Anyway, I see nothing in the 10th Amendment that allows states to actively VIOLATE federal law, as it happening in California, where localities are actively promoting the cultivation, distribution, sale, and taxation of marijuana, which is CLEARLY in violation of federal drug trafficking laws, which have been repeatedly tested in court, and upheld.</p>
<p>I concur that the DoJ&#8217;s suit against AZ would be constitutionally destructive if it is successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Federal Legal Precedence Dead?&#8230;or, Dixie&#8217;s Spirit Still Lives! by Green Lantern</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2893&#038;cpage=1#comment-71137</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Lantern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2893#comment-71137</guid>
		<description>IANAL, but it would seem that the 10th Amendment pretty well lays out that the states get to decide how this stuff is enforced, whether it&#039;s hemp or illegal immigration. 

The Constitution could be in serious jeopardy if this Arizona case gets any headway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IANAL, but it would seem that the 10th Amendment pretty well lays out that the states get to decide how this stuff is enforced, whether it&#8217;s hemp or illegal immigration. </p>
<p>The Constitution could be in serious jeopardy if this Arizona case gets any headway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SD Law Moves Abortion Debate to Front Burner by Owen Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1144&#038;cpage=1#comment-70198</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1144#comment-70198</guid>
		<description>Abortion should really be banned forever and those who do it should be jailed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abortion should really be banned forever and those who do it should be jailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McChrystalnacht by T. Pierett</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2870&#038;cpage=1#comment-69904</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Pierett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2870#comment-69904</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s agreeing with Stace. What was the general thinking of and especially when agreeing to be interviewed by &#039;The Rolling Stone Magazine&#039; ?? Why not &#039;Pravda&#039;?? If his common sense talents are that lacking do we really want him commanding our sons and daughters? Our president gags me but in this case he did the right thing. He had no choice.

&lt;strong&gt;Chief&#039;s Reply:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I concur.  Hopefully Petraeus will do better...if he follows through and allows some decent ROE (rules of Engagement) it&#039;ll go a long way towards improving the situation. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s agreeing with Stace. What was the general thinking of and especially when agreeing to be interviewed by &#8216;The Rolling Stone Magazine&#8217; ?? Why not &#8216;Pravda&#8217;?? If his common sense talents are that lacking do we really want him commanding our sons and daughters? Our president gags me but in this case he did the right thing. He had no choice.</p>
<p><strong>Chief&#8217;s Reply:</p>
<blockquote><p>I concur.  Hopefully Petraeus will do better&#8230;if he follows through and allows some decent ROE (rules of Engagement) it&#8217;ll go a long way towards improving the situation. </p></blockquote>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McChrystalnacht by Stace Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2870&#038;cpage=1#comment-68875</link>
		<dc:creator>Stace Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2870#comment-68875</guid>
		<description>While I despise Pres. Obama and all he represents, the good general should have resigned with comment vice violate the UCMJ with his insubordination.  We know very well he would fry a junior service member for such misconduct.  Piss poor on the general&#039;s part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I despise Pres. Obama and all he represents, the good general should have resigned with comment vice violate the UCMJ with his insubordination.  We know very well he would fry a junior service member for such misconduct.  Piss poor on the general&#8217;s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Policy? We don&#8217;t need no stinking policy! by William</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2866&#038;cpage=1#comment-68800</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2866#comment-68800</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s probably waiting for an &quot;Ivory Tower&quot; panel of experts to tell him what to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s probably waiting for an &#8220;Ivory Tower&#8221; panel of experts to tell him what to do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil Spill = Cap and Tax by William</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2868&#038;cpage=1#comment-68798</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=2868#comment-68798</guid>
		<description>As the WHO famously wrote - &quot;We won&#039;t be fooled again&quot;!  (of course, SOME of us never were...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the WHO famously wrote &#8211; &#8220;We won&#8217;t be fooled again&#8221;!  (of course, SOME of us never were&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
