<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RadioActive Chief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com</link>
	<description>Stronghold of the VRWC in northwestern Moody County, South Dakota</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Enough Already of the Republocrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3773</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3773#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republocratic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to get back into blogging, stimulated by an e-mail exchange with a county GOP party leader. Firstly was this comment from radio conservatalker Michael Savage: Looking ahead to the new year, Dr. Savage mused about the steps needed to &#8220;save this country&#8221; from both Democrats and a Republican leadership addicted to power, money and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to get back into blogging, stimulated by an e-mail exchange with a county GOP party leader. Firstly was this comment from radio conservatalker Michael Savage:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Looking ahead to the new year, Dr. Savage mused about the steps needed to &#8220;save this country&#8221; from both Democrats and a Republican leadership addicted to power, money and big government. </em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em> The American people, he warned, may have to adopt the extreme tactics of leftist activists if they wish to succeed.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;In January, I&#8217;m going to start telling you what the Republicans need to do to save this country,&#8221; Savage said to his listeners.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>I don&#8217;t know if we can do it, but we&#8217;ll try.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>We&#8217;re probably going to have to get in the face of Boehner, McConnell and the rest of the GOP leadership. We&#8217;re probably going to have to become a sort of conservative &#8220;Occupy&#8221; movement in order to get them to stop screwing us. </em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I know one rule in life: When Democrats and Republicans get together, the American people are being screwed. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s going on right now.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em> Make no mistake: Boehner wasn&#8217;t elected. </em> <em> He was brought in on the coattails of all the young conservative people that were swept into power. </em> <em> He and McConnell and the rest of the so-called leaders are hated.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em> Yet they act like their mandate to keep screwing the American people has been renewed.Â </em></p>
<p>Forwarding the above resulted in this reply:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>I can see his point to an extent, but most of the tactics of the left (blocking bridges and traffic during rush hour, flash mobs, demonstrating in malls, etc) just tend to P**S people off &#8211; lol</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>I think the louder and crazier the Left gets, the better it is for us. Â Most people aren&#8217;t particularly ideological but they DO tend to block out belligerent and noisy.</em></p>
<p>OK. Â Reasonable enough&#8230;but it seems to the Chief that that response forgets that one can be more assertive without resort to the hard-core obnoxiousness of the progressive occupiers: Remember when the TeaParty got started?Â  There was plenty of &#8220;direct action&#8221; there that didn&#8217;t go over the line&#8230;the key principle there is that my exercise of rights stops Â before rights of othersÂ such asÂ free passage, etc., are violated. There are ways of being more assertive in a targeted way without going around the bend crazy like the anarcholeft.</p>
<p>The thing thatÂ DOESÂ drive me crazy is the spineless lack of principles exhibited by Boehner, McConnell, and the GOP establishment.Â  There is no real reason we shouldn&#8217;t be standing up for ourselves, rather than knuckling under with stuff like the cromnibus, plans for &#8220;comprehensive immigration reform&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p>Local case in point: Sen-electÂ Rounds declaration of a bi-partisan strategy for legislation.Â  Oh joy.Â  That sure as hell is NOT what we need&#8230;especially when the Dems&#8217; idea of compromise is to propose some new and/or expanded &#8220;progressive&#8221; scheme, and then reduce the size of the expansion as a &#8220;compromise&#8221; deal. Of course in all such cases, the only argument is not whether orÂ  not to continue the leftward drift. Â The only debate under those terms is how fast we socialize.</p>
<p>Daschle was the Grand Master of this when he was Senate Majority Leader. If THIS is what Rounds <del>stands for</del> waffles on, Â Pressler should have been elected&#8211;at least HE was honest during the campaign in defining himself as a progressive.</p>
<p>The actual issues themselves areÂ NOT really complicated in spite of what the RepublocraticÂ Demicans and the lame-stream media make it out to be, whether it&#8217;s health care, taxes, or whatever. Â This is worth additional comment, which will be forthcoming in the near future. &#8217;nuff said.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3773</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blognote</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3746</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3746#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Admin Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changes being made&#8230;more to follow. Life DOES continue, contrary to evidence of lack of postings.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changes being made&#8230;more to follow.  Life DOES continue, contrary to evidence of lack of postings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3746</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Big Surprise!</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3735</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3735#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["The law is an ass!"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Insecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police: Boston Bombing Suspects Didnâ€™t Have Gun Permits A Massachusetts police official say the brothers suspected of bombing the Boston Marathon before having shootouts with authorities didnâ€™t have gun permits. Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas tells The Associated Press in an interview Sunday that neither Tamerlan Tsarnaev (tsahr-NEYEâ€™-ehv) nor his brother Dzhokhar had permission to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Police: Boston Bombing Suspects Didnâ€™t Have Gun Permits</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
A Massachusetts police official say the brothers suspected of bombing the Boston Marathon before having shootouts with authorities didnâ€™t have gun permits.</p>
<p>Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas tells The Associated Press in an interview Sunday that neither Tamerlan Tsarnaev (tsahr-NEYEâ€™-ehv) nor his brother Dzhokhar had permission to carry firearms.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shocking, simply shocking!  Homicidal jihadists breaking the Taxachusetts gun laws!  </p>
<p>Fear not&#8230;this will no doubt stimulate the drive for more laws to be ignored by lawbreakers.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3735</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Reich in Reach: Deutschland Ã¼ber Alles!</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3732</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3732#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Across the Pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econopolitics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merkel To Europe: &#8220;Prepare To Cede Sovereignty&#8221; &#8230;as always happens, once the crisis talk is back, so is discussion of a fiscal union. Sure enough, earlier today Germany&#8217;s Angela Merkel once again reminded everyone just what the stakes are in order to achieve a truly stable, and sustainable European union: nothing short of ceding sovereignty [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-22/merkel-europe-prepare-cede-sovereignty">Merkel To Europe: &#8220;Prepare To Cede Sovereignty&#8221;</a></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;as always happens, once the crisis talk is back, so is discussion of a fiscal union. Sure enough, earlier today Germany&#8217;s Angela Merkel once again reminded everyone just what the stakes are in order to achieve a truly stable, and sustainable European union: nothing short of ceding sovereignty to Germany. And with that we are back to square one, because that has always been the trade off &#8211; want a unified, fiscally and monetarily, Europe? You can get it: just bow down to Merkel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just goes to show&#8230;you can catch more countries with cash than with bullets.  </p>
<p>The Euros can at least be glad that the Germans didn&#8217;t figure this out 75 years ago or so when a somewhat different set of people were in charge of the Reich! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3732</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mullahs Like Hagelian &#8220;Dialectics&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3727</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3727#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamunism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran Hopes Hagel Nomination Will Improve Relations Between US, Tehran Iranâ€™s Foreign Ministry appears to be backing President Barack Obamaâ€™s pick of former Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., as secretary of defense. Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said in an interview Tuesday that he hopes the Hagel nomination will improve relations between the United States and Tehran. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/08/iran-hopes-hagel-nomination-will-improve-relations-between-us-tehran/">Iran Hopes Hagel Nomination Will Improve Relations Between US, Tehran</a></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Iranâ€™s Foreign Ministry appears to be backing President Barack Obamaâ€™s pick of former Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., as secretary of defense. Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said in an interview Tuesday that he hopes the Hagel nomination will improve relations between the United States and Tehran. â€œWe hope there will be practical changes in American foreign policy and that Washington becomes respectful of the rights of nations,â€ Mehmanparast said, according to Reuters.</p></blockquote>
<p>This sure doesn&#8217;t make the chief feel any better about this particular nomination.  I didn&#8217;t care for Hegel then, and I still don&#8217;t care for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3727</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Approaching the REAL Fiscal Cliff:</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3720</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3720#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econopolitics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many (most?) peoples&#8217; heads spin and their brains go TILT! at trying to understand the fiscal mess in Washington. So&#8230;try it a different way: Understanding the REAL Fiscal Cliff: PART 1 U.S. Government U.S. Tax Revenue $2,171,000,000,000 Federal Budget $3,880,000,000,000 Deficit (New Debt) $1,650,000,000,000 National Debt $14,271,000,000,000 Recent Budget Cuts $38,500,000,000 PART 2 Family BudgetÂ  [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many (most?) peoples&#8217; heads spin and their brains go TILT! at trying to understand the fiscal mess in Washington.</p>
<p>So&#8230;try it a different way:</p>
<table width="368" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<colgroup>
<col width="62" />
<col width="72" />
<col width="64" />
<col width="170" /> </colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" width="368" height="22"><strong>Understanding the REAL Fiscal Cliff:</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"><strong>PART 1</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>U.S. Government</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" height="22">U.S. Tax Revenue</td>
<td></td>
<td align="right">$2,171,000,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" height="22">Federal Budget</td>
<td></td>
<td align="right">$3,880,000,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="22">Deficit (New Debt)</td>
<td align="right">$1,650,000,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" height="22">National Debt</td>
<td></td>
<td align="right">$14,271,000,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="22">Recent Budget Cuts</td>
<td align="right">$38,500,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"><strong>PART 2</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Family BudgetÂ </strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" height="22">Drop 8 zeros from the above and assume</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" height="22">it to be a family&#8217;s household budget</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" height="22">Annual Income</td>
<td></td>
<td align="right">$21,700.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" height="22">Annual spending</td>
<td></td>
<td align="right">$38,200.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="22">New credit card debt</td>
<td align="right">$16,500.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="22">Outstanding c.c. balance</td>
<td align="right">$142,710.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="22">Recent Budget Cuts</td>
<td align="right">$38.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="22"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" height="22"><strong><em>See?Â  Not so hard to understand after all!</em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" height="22"><strong><br />
Would/could you run YOUR family like this?<br />
How long could you get away with it?<br />
</strong><em><strong>So what&#8217;s wrong with Washington?</strong></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3720</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toward a New Nationalism</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3711</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from radio talker Michael Savage: &#8220;I have said that the only thing that can save America from this drift towards internationalism is my slogan &#8216;borders, language, culture&#8217; and a new nationalist party. Now, it almost happened with the Tea Party, but it was decimated by the unions and others. First the Tea Party was attacked [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from radio talker <a href="http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/">Michael Savage</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;I have said that the only thing that can save America from this drift towards internationalism is my slogan &#8216;borders, language, culture&#8217; and a new nationalist party. </p>
<blockquote><p>
Now, it almost happened with the Tea Party, but it was decimated by the unions and others. </p>
<p>First the Tea Party was attacked by the Congressional Black Caucus, who lied about them. </p>
<p>Then the Democratic Party went after the Tea Party.</p>
<p>The very essence of America is the Tea Party. And yet they were cast as the enemies of America. Socialists completely lied about them. </p>
<p>Most liberals are afraid of nationalism. They always come to the same conclusion: that nationalism will lead to Hitler.</p>
<p>But it doesn&#8217;t have to be that way. Nationalism can lead to pride and survival. </p>
<p>The ideal nationalist party will have a strict firewall, never going over the line into racism. That&#8217;s important. </p>
<p>If I had the time left on earth, I would start this nationalist party. It would take approximately 10 years to have an effect on the country. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if America has that much time.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The Chief concurs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3711</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FB:  Another shot at guns&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3708</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3708#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BANNED ON FACEBOOK:]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/038484_Gandhi_quote_Facebook_censorship.html">BANNED ON FACEBOOK:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.radioactivechief.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Gandhi-Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3709" title="Gandhi-Quote" src="http://www.radioactivechief.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Gandhi-Quote.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="424" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3708</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Modest On-line Gun Control Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3706</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3706#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Received via e-mail.Â  It seemed to cry out for an answer. Here&#8217;s mine: I signed a petition to The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate, and President Barack Obama which says:Â  &#8220;Our second amendment rights are long overdue a reevaluation. Going back to the Declaration of Independence: â€œâ€¦CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTSâ€¦AMONG THESE ARE [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Received via e-mail.Â  It seemed to cry out for an answer. Here&#8217;s mine:</p>
<blockquote><p>I signed a petition to The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate, and President Barack Obama which says:Â  &#8220;Our second amendment rights are long overdue a reevaluation.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Going back to the Declaration of Independence: â€œâ€¦CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTSâ€¦AMONG THESE ARE LIFEâ€¦â€ The right to life nust necessarily include a right to self-defense. Self-defense must necessarily include the means to act in self-defense. Guns do the job, with the added benefit that they keep our rulers nervousâ€”a good thing according to Jefferson. Itâ€™s also worth noting that the â€œunalienable Rightsâ€ (capitalized in the original!) are â€œendowed by their Creatorâ€ and therefore logically take precedence over the laws of man.<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>This is NOT a theoretical situation. In our immediate â€œneighborhoodâ€ in extremely rural South Dakota there has been circumstances where people were required to defend themselves using firearms, covered fortunately by SDâ€™s version of a â€œCastle Lawâ€ which specifically reaffirms the right to appropriate self-defense. As far as police protection goes, all it can do is come in afterwards and try to clean up the mess. With the local sheriff 20 miles away on a good day, an evildoer can do a LOT of damage before any help arises.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>How many more senseless and entirely PREVENTABLE shootings have to occur before we do something about Gun Control?</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Uhâ€¦howâ€™s about mental health control? There are too many people who are dangerous who cannot be taken care of properly, since courts have ruled that to administer treatment (against the free-will of a schizophrenic, for instance) is a violation of their civil rightsâ€¦the right to be dangerously crazy one must presume.</em></p>
<p><em>My idea of gun control means that you maintain control (including custodial control) of your weapons, and are able to hit what you aim at when you use them.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>As a citizen and constituent of this great country, I am asking that you take a firm stand and make a positive change by restricting access to guns and saving lives.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Studies, even ones run by scholars who started with an anti-gun agenda, have shown that where jurisdictions allow gun possession and â€œright to carryâ€ that violent gun crime is reduced. (No, I don&#8217;t have the citation at my finger-tips. Yes, the findings are available if you do want to see &#8217;em.)</em></p>
<p><em>As for positive change? I taught Native American students for a quarter centuryâ€¦one of the first things enforced on the reservations was STRICT gun control. That worked out really well for them, didnâ€™t it? Howâ€™s about the gun control law enacted by the 3rd Reich marching society. which effectively disarmed their opponents and potential opponents. Then, when the guys with the spiffy balck uniforms showed up at you door at oh-dark-thirty, they were sure there could be no way their eveningâ€™s visit would have an unpleasant (to them) outcome. (By the way, the Nazi gun law of 1938 was used as the template (sometimes word-for-word) for several laws and wanna-be laws that have found their way to Congress since the â€˜60â€™s.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t have a gun. I don&#8217;t want a gun.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Fair enough. Donâ€™t get one. But donâ€™t force me (via indirect use of the gun-backed power of the government) to have your preference imposed on me.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t need a gun. But somehow the guns always wind up in the hands of people crazy enough to use them irresponsibly and dangerously.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Guns ARE dangerous. Just as are automobiles, 120 V electrical outlets, alcohol, texting cell phones, knives,Â  (some) TV programs, Â baseball bats, claw hammers, and so on.Â  What was the one recently about the nut-ball who started that fireâ€¦he killed his 92 year old mother with a hammerâ€¦then they let him out after 18 years and he continued his insanity by committing arson, murder, and then shooting at the firemen?Â  See above comment on mental health control.</em></p>
<p><em>The Roman sage Seneca had it pegged:Â  QUAEMADMOEUM GLADIUS NEMINEM OCCIDIT, OCCIDENTIS TELUM EST.Â  (A sword is never a killer, it is a tool in the killerâ€™s hands.)</em></p>
<blockquote><p>This HAS TO BE STOPPED.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Living in this worldâ€¦there is no way to guarantee ANY type of security given humanity and life as it is. Not in the past. Not in the present. And not in the future.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Thank you for your action!!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><em>I recently renewed my NRA membershipâ€”does that count?</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Will you sign this petition?</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Uhâ€¦not in this universe, but thanks for asking anyway. Hope youâ€™re having a good Christmas season.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3706</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe&#8217;s just checking&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3704</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3704#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uh...something?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biden promotes free colonoscopies to seniors in Florida Occasionally something comes along that just leaves one in a state of amazement. This stuff couldn&#8217;t be made up. In Florida this afternoon, Vice President Joe Biden reminded supporters that thanks to President Obama, they could now get colonoscopies without a co-pay. SO now we can get [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/biden-promotes-free-colonoscopies-to-seniors-in-florida/article/2509330#.UGZ7aq4lp8E">Biden promotes free colonoscopies to seniors in Florida</a></strong></p>
<p>Occasionally something comes along that just leaves one in a state of amazement.  This stuff couldn&#8217;t be made up.</p>
<blockquote><p>In Florida this afternoon, Vice President Joe Biden reminded supporters that thanks to President Obama, they could now get colonoscopies without a co-pay.</p></blockquote>
<p>SO now we can get reamed for free thanks to B.O. and company.</p>
<p>They already have the recently expanded I.R.S., so bend over, they&#8217;ll get you one way or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3704</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
