<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Ruling on Film Not Favoring &#8220;Greens&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470</link>
	<description>Stronghold of the VRWC in northwestern Moody County, South Dakota</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470&#038;cpage=1#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470#comment-486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Do something about it&quot;...

Well we can ALWAYS DO SOMETHING (even if it&#039;s a meaningless fruitless gesture).  We can obviously determine that our present global climate is optimum for human existence and since we have such a deep understanding of all of the variables involved we can not only accurately PREDICT weather for more than 48/72 hours but we can CONTROL our climate and all it&#039;s variables (solar, tectonic, volcanic, etc) to maintain our optimum climate forever!  We will no longer have to adapt to change as we become the gods we once worshipped. (Yeah, right...)

For a more constructive look at what we can do that doesn&#039;t involve destroying our economy, creating more poverty and creating International Commissions look here  http://www.lomborg.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do something about it&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Well we can ALWAYS DO SOMETHING (even if it&#8217;s a meaningless fruitless gesture).  We can obviously determine that our present global climate is optimum for human existence and since we have such a deep understanding of all of the variables involved we can not only accurately PREDICT weather for more than 48/72 hours but we can CONTROL our climate and all it&#8217;s variables (solar, tectonic, volcanic, etc) to maintain our optimum climate forever!  We will no longer have to adapt to change as we become the gods we once worshipped. (Yeah, right&#8230;)</p>
<p>For a more constructive look at what we can do that doesn&#8217;t involve destroying our economy, creating more poverty and creating International Commissions look here  <a href="http://www.lomborg.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lomborg.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470&#038;cpage=1#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470#comment-468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly I am underwhelmed anytime Judges get involved in scientific issues. This instance is in the category of a &quot;man bites dog&quot; story, where at least SOME science penetrated the labyrinthine legal mind.

As far as the &quot;affirmative&quot; points mentioned, climate change is made primarily  first, last and primarily by the sun, and its variations.  (Yes, the sun is a VARIABLE star!)  

Not only THAT, there actually is a climate effect (with the mechanism described) from astronomical effects from OUTSIDE of the solar system, where cosmic ray variations changes the amount of overall cloud cover...hence, changes our climate...significantly in some cases.  This science IS out there!


Anything we could do by accident, or by intent is insignificant compared to that.  Temperatures rising?  Maybe so...but not from US!

Climate change with &quot;bad&quot; consequences?  It was measurably warmer during the middle ages (for example), and conditions were BETTER in most ways that count.  

I COULD go on at length, and get way more specific (after teaching chemistry, physics, and geophysical sciences for 25 years I DO know how to find and understand scientific publication without filtering through AlGor or some politically motivated UN commission), and I expect to post on this more in the future (as I already have in teh past)  as specific stuff comes out.

As far as playing &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; argument, I have found the &quot;Pig Rule&quot; rapidly comes into play: &quot;Never mud wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I am underwhelmed anytime Judges get involved in scientific issues. This instance is in the category of a &#8220;man bites dog&#8221; story, where at least SOME science penetrated the labyrinthine legal mind.</p>
<p>As far as the &#8220;affirmative&#8221; points mentioned, climate change is made primarily  first, last and primarily by the sun, and its variations.  (Yes, the sun is a VARIABLE star!)  </p>
<p>Not only THAT, there actually is a climate effect (with the mechanism described) from astronomical effects from OUTSIDE of the solar system, where cosmic ray variations changes the amount of overall cloud cover&#8230;hence, changes our climate&#8230;significantly in some cases.  This science IS out there!</p>
<p>Anything we could do by accident, or by intent is insignificant compared to that.  Temperatures rising?  Maybe so&#8230;but not from US!</p>
<p>Climate change with &#8220;bad&#8221; consequences?  It was measurably warmer during the middle ages (for example), and conditions were BETTER in most ways that count.  </p>
<p>I COULD go on at length, and get way more specific (after teaching chemistry, physics, and geophysical sciences for 25 years I DO know how to find and understand scientific publication without filtering through AlGor or some politically motivated UN commission), and I expect to post on this more in the future (as I already have in teh past)  as specific stuff comes out.</p>
<p>As far as playing &#8220;tit-for-tat&#8221; argument, I have found the &#8220;Pig Rule&#8221; rapidly comes into play: &#8220;Never mud wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470&#038;cpage=1#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Infidel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=1470#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You failed to mention that the judge quite clearly expressed that the movie won&#039;t be banned from schools, as Dimmock demanded, because the detected errors were minor in nature and that the movie contains four main messages that are very well and truthfully documented: That climate change is made by man, that temperatures will rise further, that the climate change will have bad consequences and that it is possible for governments and individuals to do something about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You failed to mention that the judge quite clearly expressed that the movie won&#8217;t be banned from schools, as Dimmock demanded, because the detected errors were minor in nature and that the movie contains four main messages that are very well and truthfully documented: That climate change is made by man, that temperatures will rise further, that the climate change will have bad consequences and that it is possible for governments and individuals to do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
