<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RadioActive Chief &#187; Fiscal Follies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=fiscal-follies" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com</link>
	<description>Stronghold of the VRWC in northwestern Moody County, South Dakota</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Fighting Over Chump Change!</title>
		<link>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3469</link>
		<comments>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3469#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 04:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Follies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Gov't Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioactivechief.com/?p=3469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CORRECTION! Ooops! The Chief&#8217;s percentages listed below are off a bit, due to his use of an incorrect total for the proposed 2011 non-budget. The really bad news part of this is that the outcome is even worse than before&#8230;in other words the actual &#8220;chump change&#8221; at the center of the current dogfight is even [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);"><strong>CORRECTION!</strong></center></span><br />
Ooops!  The Chief&#8217;s percentages listed below are off a bit, due to his use of an incorrect total for the proposed 2011 non-budget.  The really bad news part of this is that the outcome is even worse than before&#8230;in other words the actual &#8220;chump change&#8221; at the center of the current dogfight is even LESS significant than previously calculated.  Corrected figures are plugged in at the appropriate places in the post:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/06/budget-deal-elusive-congressional-leaders-face-pressure/">White House Summit Fails to Yield Budget Deal as Shutdown Approaches</a></strong></p>
<p>What a total joke!</p>
<blockquote><p>President Obama, after a high-stakes meeting Wednesday night with congressional leaders at the White House, called the discussion &#8220;frank&#8221; and &#8220;constructive&#8221; but said no budget deal was reached.</p>
<p>&#8220;If we are serious about getting something done we should be able to complete a deal, get it passed and avert a shutdown,&#8221; Obama told reporters in the White House briefing room, though it remained unclear how the two sides would forge such an agreement.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately this whole discussion is a virtual farce!<br />
According to the Washington Post, the Donkey Party has expressed willingness to accept a whopping $23B cut at this time.  That represents approx. a <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);"><strong><s>1.6%</s> 0.7%</strong></span> cut.  The GOP on the other hand is currently thumping for a righteous and allegedly draconian $40B cutback, which is about a <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);"><strong><s>3%</s> 1.2%</strong></span> cut.  So, do the math&#8230;the big brouhaha (ha ha ha indeed!) is about a difference of $17B, a huge difference of <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);"><strong><s>1.4%</s> 0.5%</strong></span> of the total budget!</p>
<p>Yep!  Just imagine for comparison purposes what would happen to your personal or family budget if you were forced to confront a massive <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);"><strong><s> 3%</s> 0.5% loss of income &#8211; 1/2 cent per dollar!</strong></span>  Definitely a case of being reduced to dumpster diving and hitchhiking?  It is according to Pelosi, Reid, <em>et al</em>. Doubtful however in reality, unless you are a bigger dolt than the Congresscritters fighting about the arrangement of deck chairs on the listing titanic ship of state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radioactivechief.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3469</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
