SD County Roulette Killed

House panel rejects county consolidation plan

A South Dakota House committee has rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have started the process of reducing the number of counties in the state.
Advertisement

HJR1002 sought to amend the constitution to limit counties to no fewer than 25,000 residents or 5,000 square miles, whichever is less.

The Chief noted this in a previous post. If he was a betting man, his bet would have been that this bill was pretty much a no-go from the get-go, and that’s where it went.

Daschle’s Totalitarian “Health” Plans

So, what does anyone care about Daschle’s plans for anything any more?

Well, he night be gone, but his ideas for health care are part of the aforementioned B.O. B.S. B.O. Bill.

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan

Republican Senators are questioning whether President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy. Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department.

Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors

“So far, everything’s OK”. (in the words of a man falling from the Empire State Building, as he passed the 50th floor.) Then it gets really messy:

One (emphasis added) new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446).

NOTE: “…what the government deems appropriate and cost effective.” Not you and your doctor…THE GOVERNMENT. So much for any remnant of medical independence, but wait!  It doesn’t stop there:

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)

What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.

The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal…is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He [Daschle] praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

And the practical effect: Welcome to the U.K.! (or worse.)

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt. Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

Like Hitler did with Mein Kampf, Daschle has published his own vision vision of this brave new world.

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly…

In other words, once your usefulness to society is done, then you should welcome this 21st century version of the tribal elderly being cast out into the blizzard when their day is done. So much for compassionate care.

Herr Himmler, and his pet Dr. Mengele would have heartily approved of this scheme to cut out support of such “useless eaters” as the infirm elderly.

The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined(90-92, 174-177, 181).

!!!?

Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”

Right to life? What’s that any more? Nothing…that question was settled by Roe v. Wade. This is merely an all too logical extension of that attitude. The Chief isn’t a Catholic, but Pope John Paul was spot on when he warned against a culture of death.

As the cartoon character “Pogo” observed: “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

B.O.’s BS B-O Bill Passes Senate

Senate passes $838 billion stimulus bill

Well, the formless legislative blob of the Gigabuck omnibus banking, finance, and industrial nationalization act has entered the maw of the Senate, moved into the inner digestive processes of lawmaking, and inevitably, appropriately (to according to the Great One and his DonkCong adherents) completed its passage through the belly of the legislative beast and emerged as…what can described as noted above: B.O.’s B.S. Bailout Bill.

Senate passage of an $838 billion stimulus bill triggered an intense round of late-night bargaining on Tuesday, with the White House and key congressional Democrats seeking agreement on a final compromise aimed at combatting the worst economic crisis in decades.

If you don’t like it, don’t worry, your grandkids will get to pay for it, and you won’t have to be bothered…that is, unless you think rationally, and still have a functional conscience.

Chicago School Problems: The Heritage of the New Ed. Secretary!

‘Painful Lessons': Abuse At Chicago Schools
Hundreds Of Kids Beaten, Whipped, Even Choked By Teachers, Coaches

A couple of weeks ago there was news of $67,000 being spent on a no-bid deal for cappucino machines for Chicago schools, most of which hadn’t requested them, and weren’t even using them once they were delivered.

Now, comes another installment showing how the Chicago school system has been in the habit of operating.

Treveon Martin, 10, is afraid of a teacher at his school. “I’ve seen him hit five of them in the classroom,” Martin said.

Martin says he and others have been hit, grabbed and even struck with a belt. “He’s threatened almost all the kids in his classroom,” Martin said.

He says it happened at Robert Emmet Academy in November but a Chicago Public School investigator didn’t talk to him until last week – 70 days after the case was reported, and not until after we started asking questions.

“He holded my arms and he picked my body up, and then he just slammed me on the desk,” Martin said.

An exclusive CBS 2 investigation discovered Treveon Martin is one of at least 818 Chicago Public School students, since 2003, to allege being battered by a teacher or an aide, coach, security guard, or even a principal. In most of those cases – 568 of them – Chicago Public School investigators determined the children were telling the truth.

So, just another local issue? It shouldn’t be.

These sorts of incidents don’t spontaneously appear in a large organization. They won’t appear at all where competent, engaged, hands-on management is not afraid to set and enforce rigorous standards of professional conduct at all levels.  In order for this pattern of mismanagement to have arisen, those in charge are prima facie guilty of failure to exercise due diligence in the performance of their responsibilities.

The REAL question at this point is where is the media’s questioning of Secretary of Education Arne Duncan about his prior and  apparently poor performance as CEO of the Chicago Public Schools, under which the above noted financial, (and even more seriously) physical abuses occurred.

From the Department of Education website we find the following:

Prior to his appointment as secretary of education, Duncan served as the chief executive officer of the Chicago Public Schools, a position to which he was appointed by Mayor Richard M. Daley, from June 2001 through December 2008, becoming the longest-serving big-city education superintendent in the country. (emphasis added)

Seems to the Chief that Duncan SHOULD have some ‘splainen’ to do!

DOE’s bio blurb goes on:

As CEO, Duncan’s mandate was to raise education standards and performance, improve teacher and principal quality…

If that was Duncan’s mandate, based on the evidence, he failed to live up to expectations…and now he’s the man that B.O. (The Exalted One) himself has picked to lead the rest of the country’s educational establishment ever onward and upwards beyond the realm of “no child left behind”.

(Eeeeeuuuu!)

Better the Department of Education was eliminated than to turn it over to Duncan’s apparently incompetent management.

Technophobes Dominant in Pierre

Panel kills plan for online public notices

South Dakota law should continue to require government public notices to be placed in newspapers, not on the Internet, a legislative committee says.

The House Local Government Committee voted 7-5 on Thursday to kill HB1135, which would have given state and local governments a choice of using newspapers or Internet web sites to publish minutes, bid offerings and other official notices.

OK. They don’t want ot put public notices on-line.

Supposedly this is so it’s more accessible to print in local newspapers, but how many people have on-line access virtually 24-7 at their home compared to taking the additional expense and hassle of either subscribing to a paper and/or making an extra trip to get one in the town where it is available…but which is off the beaten path, and NOT a normal destination point?

Of course a lot of the opposition to this comes from the dead-tree media, so what else could they say?

The bill would have allowed people to request that they receive government notices by mail, rather than through the Internet. That feature of the bill would increase public notice costs to local governments, said David Bordewyk of the South Dakota Newspaper Association.

“I would suggest you are creating quite a cost,” Bordewyk said.

IF anyone wanted a paper copy, it is one heck of a lot handier to jut print it from the computer than demand snail mail.

He also questioned whether digital records could be altered, either maliciously or unintentionally.

“Putting information online does not equate to ink on paper,” Bordewyk said.

Apparently no one at the newspaper association has ever heard of, or understands, or is willing to admit that they know how Acrobat PDF files are set up.

Rep. Darrell Solberg, D-Sioux Falls, questioned whether Internet postings would be accessible to as many people as are local newspapers.

“Readership on the Internet, in terms of legal notices, is meager,” Solberg said.

So he thinks that lengthy legalese notices, printed in a newspaper in microscopically small print is a hot item for readership? The Chief thinks it more likely that readership of legal notices in a newspaper, even among newspaper readers is “meager”.

Besides, if no one looks at stuff on the internet, why do ALL the newspapers have websites with their leading news coverage? Surely a lot of someones are looking at the sites, or else the newspapers themselves are themselves “creating quite a cost” to no good result.

Give me a break.

This just fits the trend of government at all levels dragging its feet at moving into the e-information age….If they did that, maybe they would even have to account more to the voters for what they do when most people aren’t looking over their shoulders.

Nanny-state Takes a Blow

Adelstein: Smoking ban faced “tremendous amount of pressure”

Sen. Stan Adelstein, R-Rapid City, said he’s disappointed the Senate failed to pass a statewide smoking ban this week. “There was a tremendous amount of pressure,” said Adelstein, who chairs the Senate Health and Human Services committee.

The Senate voted 18-17 on Tuesday to kill SB83, which would have banned smoking in all indoor public spaces, including bars, restaurants, casinos, hotels, video lottery establishments and tobacco shops.

Disclosure: The Chief does NOT smoke or use tobacco products, and if asked, would discourage anyone from doing so, for both obvious and personal reasons.

Having said that, the state really has no business telling someone that they cannot engage in a legal (and taxed!) activity on private property, if that’s what the owners and customers are willing to accept. If someone doesn’t want to be around the tobacco use, then there is freedom to find somewhre else to take one’s business.

Somehow the Chief is not surprised that stealth Democrat RINO Sen. Adelstein has his paw prints all over this idea. It’s the old lib conceit that governmental meddling can engineer and force us into meeting someone else’s idea of more desirable activity.

Once one goes down this trail, where’s the stopping point? No tobacco? OK. What about no…hamburgers, sugared pop, unsugared pop, butter, steaks, beer, wine, coffee, tea, meat, leather, dairy herds, etc…the list is endless of something that some faction or group claims results in Bad Things happening to us, or being caused by us.

Forget the whole idea…allow folks to make up their own minds about such things. Otherwise, we could end up with a system so intrusive that it  would make “1984” look like a New England town meeting.

’nuff said.

Obamanation Abomination

Agreement Reached on Economic Stimulus, Senators Say

Senators agreed on an economic stimulus plan of at least $780 billion to rescue the U.S. economy from sinking into what President Barack Obama warns would be an even deeper recession if Congress doesn’t act.

Three Republicans agreed to join Democrats who control the chamber in supporting the measure. A Senate vote, possibly this weekend, would move Congress closer to Obama’s deadline of sending a bill to him by mid-February.

Words seem to fall short at describing this quivering gelatinous legislative toxic blob, that will surely draw us along the path of B.O.’s National Socialist Democrat American Party (N.S.D.A.P.)

Unfortunately the Senate apparently can always be counted on to find at least a few Republocrats (also known as RINOS) to join with the party of the jackass and give them cover from bearing the full responsibility for their constitutional malpractice. In this case the Republocratic caucus is made up of the Maineiac senators, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe(-job), and the Pennsylvania RINO spook Arlen Spectre Spector, may their names live forever in the annals of political infamy.

Legislative Wrap – Consolidation Edition, & More

First note would be the previously posted comment on HB1182 which the Chief has Officially Designated as the Small Schools Death Act, imposing a mimimum size limit of 195. This was sent to the hypothetical after-life of the much noted but non-existent 41st Legislative Day of the session.

Then comes HB1298, which would start the theoretical ball rolling towards shutting down one of the SD University campuses. There MAY be some merit to this, depending on how it was done. (Of course there’s still no need for a full campus at Sioux Falls where there are more people concentrated, but hey, what does THAT matter?)

…and now that the consolidation juggernaut is starting to roll for schools, why stop there? All those pesky COUNTIES could consolidate too, according to HJR1002. Of course only 43 counties would probably mean more virtual distance between the Legislooters and those they represent, and that would be a disadvantage…or would it…Hmmmm…from the Legislooter’s point of view, maybe it wouldn’t be a disadvantage at all.

In the never ending search for fresh blood more money comes SB171 to tax pipelines…er…to levy a fee to protect us against pipeline spills (which are SO everyday, aren’t they?).   This would set up a fee per unit of volume passing through the state.  Pretty slick, eh?  Historically, reminds the Chief of the ORIGINAL “robber barons”  in their castles on the hills dominating the Rhine River…where they could and did collect fees on everyone and everything that sailed past them on the river.

It’s even better than road use fees on truckers since the state doesn’t even have to build or maintain the pipelines.

It just goes to show, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Finally, after losing their attempt at ending term limits, they’ve brought it back from the grave, like a bad vampire movie or something:

A state Senate committee has recommended lengthening the term limits that apply to South Dakota lawmakers.

Current law provides that a Senate or House member can serve no more than eight consecutive years in a chamber, although a lawmaker can switch and run for another chamber after being term-limited in one.

The State Affairs Committee voted 5-4 Wednesday to endorse SJR3, a proposed constitutional amendment that would extend term limits to 12 consecutive years in a chamber. It also would change the current two-year terms in the Senate to four years.

Bringing this back indicates that they just don’t get it.

Legislative Wrap – Gambling Edition

It’s the high legislative season in South dakota, and the Chief has taken cognizance of some pithy items that have inspired some commentary:

Democrats push higher state cut of gambling

DISCLAIMER: The Chief is opposed to state-run lotteries or gambling to raise government money. Personally, the Chief considers lotteries and gambling a self-assessed voluntary tax on stupidity. You decide for yourself how stupid you are, and pay accordingly!

If something the government does is important enough to people, they they had darned well be willing to face the reality that things cost money, and somehow contrive to raise enough taxes to get the programs they want. If raising taxes to do this is too onerous, then it may be supposed that the programs maybe aren’t that important to people after all, and deserve to go away (or not get started as a means for Legislooters to bnbe the constituency for votes).

A group of Democratic legislators want state government to take a bigger cut of the South Dakota video lottery revenue.

Rep. Peggy Gibson, D-Huron, is prime sponsor of HB1290, which would give the state 60 percent of the net machine income from video lottery. The state currently takes 50 percent. The higher state cut would last only until July 1, 2010.

What else can be said, except to note that Legislooters do what Legislooters do…try to figure out how to extract rvrtmore money from us to give us stuff that we get to pay for, to impress us so we vote for them again.

(Am I REALLY that cynical about it? Yeah…maybe so.)

Senate panel endorses plan to block Iowa casino

A proposed constitutional amendment that could lead to a huge casino in Sioux Falls was approved Wednesday by a South Dakota Senate Committee.

The measure’s main sponsor, Senate Democratic Leader Scott Heidepriem of Sioux Falls, said SJ1 is not aimed at building a Sioux Falls casino but is intended to be a threat to prevent construction of a casino in Larchwood, Iowa, only a few miles from Sioux Falls.

The mind is boggled by the prospect of amending the state constitution to allow more gambling…in order to prevent…more gambling! (Dang! More gambling Means Less Gambling! That fits right in with WAR IS PEACE, SLAVERY IS FREEDOM, etc. I had NO idea that George Orwell was still alive and had moved to Pierre!)

In the short term it might actually slow the wascally Iowegians in Larchwood, but you just KNOW if the authorization is written into the SD Constitution, somewhere down the line there will be an oh-so-vital need to exercise it.  Just put the two items together:  more money and more (potential) gambling…and then it’ll be Katie bar the door to stop S.F, Rapid City, etc. from getting a taste of being mini-Vegas.  What legislooter could resist the combination?

Glowbull Warming Underway In Britain

Britain faces another 10 inches of snow as grit supplies run low

Relatives in the south of England told us that a 2 or 3 inches of snowfall was occasionally a part of the winters there…but not much more than that. In fact they came over to visit us here in South Dakota in FEBRUARY one year, just to get into some real winter weather for a change. (The Chief is STILL wondering about that one…but hey, they liked it, and we all had fun, so why not?)

This year has been far from that circumstance, as the latest round of Glowbull Warming has delivered more than 10″ to London, and other areas of the U.K.

Britain faces a fresh bout of travel chaos after councils began running out of grit as a further 10 inches of snow was forecast.

Britain braced for another eight inches of snow

Up to eight inches could fall on high ground tonight, with several inches across low ground in Wales, the Midlands, Lincolnshire and Yorkshire.

Forecasters said the UK faces a “pincer movement” with another band of snow moving across Scotland and into Northern Ireland. A Met Office spokesman said: “It’s the second significant snow of the week. Through the weekend it’s going to be wintry with a mix of rain, sleet and snow.”

The bad weather will sweep across south-east England again on Friday bringing sporadic snowfalls in the Home Counties.

Yep – definitely more of that Glowbull Warming!

Killed: Small Schools Death Act

This occurred as the SD Legislature continues its annual session. It indicates to the Chief that there is evidence of at least some reason being present this year at the session.

Panel kills plan to raise minimum school size

A bill to make more small schools in South Dakota reorganize is premature, a House committee says.

The House Education Committee voted 12-3 on Wednesday to kill HB1182, a bill that would have required schools with fewer than 195 students to reorganize with other districts. Two years ago legislators passed the current law, which requires reorganization for schools with fewer than 100 students.

The Legislature should see how the current law works before raising the reorganization bar, opponents of the higher minimum size said.

This is a perennial proposal that bubbles up like an unpleasant gas released from the bottom of a slough while duck hunting. It doesn’t help in accomplishing anything, but just gives evidence that something (or someone, in this case) has gotten stirred up.

The given reason for this is of course (genuflect appropriately!) is to save money, which as a general principle is ALWAYS a laudable, if too rare, a thing for any governmental body to contemplate. In this case however, earlier testimony indicated that this would not be the result of this scheme.

State education officials testified earlier that reorganization wouldn’t necessarily save money because the state-aid formula is based on a per-student cost.

So, what’s the point then?

Given that there may be occasional cases of smaller districts being educationally deficient, in most cases this is not a problem, based on testing results. If local communities are willing to support their schools of whatever size, and the school district is able to work our a modus operandi that meets the needs of the students and community, then WHY IN THE HECK ARE SOME LEGISLATORS FROM OTHER COMMUNITIES SO BOUND AND DETERMINED TO IMPOSE THEIR IDEA ON THEIR FELLOW SOUTH DAKOTANS, WHEN THERE IS NO OBVIOUS GAIN IN DOING SO?

Maybe somebody knows, but the Chief sure can’t see the reason in it, so for that reason it is a good thing that H.R. 1138 seems to have met its doom, at least for another year, and community based schools like Rutland, Oldham-Ramona, and others will be able to continue serving the educational (and yes, also social) needs of their areas, just as do the schools of Brookings, Sioux Falls, Tea, Canton, or anywhere else.

B.O. Bailout Bill in Senate Trouble?

GOP leaders doubt stimulus bill will pass Senate

THIS is truly encouraging!

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Sunday the massive stimulus bill backed by President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats could go down to defeat if it’s not stripped of unnecessary spending and focused more on housing issues and tax cut.

The Senate version of the bill, which topped out at nearly $900 billion, is headed to the floor for debate. The House bill totaled about $819 billion and earned no Republican votes, even though it easily passed the Democratic-controlled House. At some point lawmakers will need to compromise on the competing versions.

Remember! These amounts don’t include the interest on the money to be spent. We’re well into the trillion + range with that!

McConnell and other Republicans suggested that the bill needed an overhaul because it doesn’t pump enough into the private sector through tax cuts and allows Democrats to go on a spending spree unlikely to jolt the economy. The Republican leader also complained that Democrats had not been as bipartisan in writing the bill as Obama had said he wanted.

“I think it may be time … for the president to kind of get a hold of these Democrats in the Senate and the House, who have rather significant majorities, and shake them a little bit and say, ‘Look, let’s do this the right way,'” McConnell said. “I can’t believe that the president isn’t embarrassed about the products that have been produced so far.”

Well, the Chief is a native of Missouri. B.O. needs to “Show me” before I’ll bellieve that will happen.

More Government? Ready or not!

Federal jobs still growing amid layoffs

Companies are cutting jobs by the tens of thousands. State and local governments are penny-pinching, too. So what about Uncle Sam? Tough times for him as well?

Not exactly. In fact the number of federal workers is on the rise.

That might seem strange to the 11 million people in the U.S. who are out of work, and the millions more who fear they soon will be. Shouldn’t Washington pare down too?

NAH! Just ask your favorite neighborhood Donk: The bureaucracy must expand to meet the needs of an expanding bureaucracy!

GOP Chair…A Sign of Progress

Steele’s conservative challenge

OpEd from the D.C. Times:

Following two consecutive national election losses, the Republican Party has been in disarray. President Barack Obama’s victory and the Democrat seizure of both houses of Congress in November were as much a stinging indictment of the GOP as an endorsement of the campaigns of its opponents (as well-oiled as the latter were). Yet with the election of former Maryland lieutenant governor and GOPAC leader Michael Steele as chairman of the Republican National Committee on Friday, anemic conservatives will get new blood….

He has already reassured the base that he will be true to them, spending much of the weekend reaching out – and in many cases assuaging – leading GOP fiscal and social conservatives, as reported by the Times’ Ralph Hallow. Mr. Steele, who trained for three years to be a Catholic priest before becoming a lawyer, understands the value – and beauty – of the traditional family. He is also firmly pro-life, even tough he is willing to broaden the GOP tent to accommodate pro-choicers.

Solidifying the base in itself does little or nothing to expand it, and if done by a dolt would only cause the GOP to be a perpetual minority. Mr. Steele is visionary enough, and smart enough, to know he must expand the “brand” to attract the broad middle. He has said repeatedly that the main failure of the GOP has not been its ideals, but its leadership, which “behaved like Democrats” and embraced big-government policies. He is first and foremost calling for a return to the pro-family, fiscal conservatism that was the bedrock of the Reagan Revolution.

The Chief thinks that this is nothing but a good move…at least from the perspective of non-country club portions of the GOP.

Now, all we need to find is someone of equal potential for the South Dakota party.

Senate Supermajority for Donks Still Elusive

Gregg exit wouldn’t boost Senate Democrats
Replacement to maintain status quo

Interesting political maneuvering going on here.

President Obama was poised to tap Republican Sen. Judd Gregg as his commerce secretary, but officials cautioned Sunday the move would not deliver Democrats complete control of the Senate as they had hoped.

Leading the pack to replace the fiscal conservative was his former chief of staff and a veteran of the Reagan White House, Bonnie Newman. Officials expect New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch, a Democrat, would name her to fill the final two years of Mr. Gregg’s term. Miss Newman would not seek the seat for a full term in 2010.

The move would allow Mr. Gregg to join the Cabinet without giving Democrats’ unchecked power in Congress.

The White house is publically keeping a “hands off” attitude…which you can believe if you really want to, I guess.

B.O. Supporters With Some Disappointment

Obama’s new rules have loopholes

President Obama’s first moves earned him triumphant headlines: “Obama Freezes Pay, Toughens Ethics and Lobbying Rules,” and “Obama sets new course.”

But some of his biggest accomplishments are twinned with the word “but”: Lobbyists are banned, but exceptions can and will be made; orders on ending torture and secret prisons contain loopholes and provisos.

Call it the fine print, an exception, a waiver, but there have been caveats to many of Mr. Obama’s first actions.

Well, that’s what you get by believing someone who believes in…what? (Still to be determined, apparently.)

“Change we can believe in, as long as we pay attention to the disappointing asterisk on the word ‘change,’ ” complained Rachel Maddow, a liberal talk-show host for MSNBC.

Hmmmm. There’s a word that comes to mind…oh yeah: S-C-H-A-D-E-N-F-R-E-U-D-E. :)

Appoointee Tax Dodge Redux

GOP senators scrutinize Daschle nomination

Former South Dakota fired Senator Tom Daschle back in the spotlight…or is it on the spot…whatever.

Hmmm. A SECOND B.O. appointee with tax…er…”issues”.

Senate Republicans piled on Health and Human Services Secretary-designate Tom Daschle for failing to pay more than $128,000 in taxes, though they stopped short of saying they would reject the South Dakota Democrat’s confirmation.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said Mr. Daschle’s tax woes, as well as those of new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, do “raise some questions about the [Obama administration’s] vetting process.”

One of the best comments the Chief ran across was also in this article:

Sen. Jim DeMint, South Carolina Republican, a staunch conservative who rarely holds back criticism of Democrats, called Mr. Daschle’s tax woes “disheartening.”

“I can see now why liberals don’t mind if the tax rate goes up, because they’re not going to pay it anyway,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Zing!

Sorry, the claims that these are “minor oversight errors”… of 6 figures (!) just doesn’t compute. I guess you CAN accept that excuse, if you want to.

If you do believe the offered explanations, please e-mail the Chief about a great deal on tropical beachfront property in Moody County, South Dakota.